Empirical Rationalism and Other Oxymora
Sales
CRM Evolution 2010 – Quick Thoughts and Takeaways (#CRMe10)
Aug 4th
I attended CRM Evolution in NYC this week. It was great to catch up with some old friends and many of the vendors I used to brief with as an analyst. It was also good to meet actual customers with actual business problems at the show (a departure from some of the other trade events I’ve been to lately). One significant change since the last time I attended a CRM-specific conference was the level of sophistication of the end users – the category has clearly matured. We are no longer talking about “what” needs to be done, or “why”, or even “how” implement and measure value — the conversations I had with end-users generally centered around really hard customer management problems (i.e. identifying and integrating “socialgraphic” and cross-site information into CRM, building out multi-purpose, multi-channel, shared service interaction centers, etc).
A few quick thoughts and key takeaways from the show:
- Everybody (yes, I do mean everybody I spoke to) is talking about “social CRM” – however, when probed there wasn’t a lot of evidence that social CRM has evolved much beyond twitter monitoring and Facebook connections in the CRM application. If customers are really going to embrace social CRM as a competitive differentiator, vendors need to take a leadership stance on demonstrating business value that can be measured with anything other than a “wow” meter. Greg Gianforte (CEO of RightNow) illustrated an interesting example of social CRM in action (paraphrasing):
If a customer has a problem with their digital camera, they are not going to wait until the next day when the call center is open – they’ll send out a tweet. [Companies need to be able to] take that tweet, open a ticket, solve the issue and send a tweet back.
- This is one use case out of thousands of possibilities. As an industry, we are still in the early stages of the social CRM platforms that are being built today will be implemented down the road. I applaud the work that is being done by the vendors and the thought leaders, but it seems to me that capabilities and thought leadership is still very much ahead of market demand.
- Where the hell is marketing? With all the talk of social CRM, it was interesting to note marketing’s conspicuous absent (both by function and role) from the CRM scene (If you look at the marketing functionality of many CRM apps, it would be easy to counter that this has always been the case). The attendees I spoke to were mostly IT and business analyst types – with some sales and contact center LOB people thrown in for good measure. There are significant challenges in integrating social into the CRM systems. One fast-fashion CxO I spoke to last month told me that the average age in his loyalty database is 25 years older than his target demographic (teenage girls 15-19) –simply put, he’s got a very active community of social influencers on Facebook, but Mom has a death grip on the loyalty card. If social CRM is going to fly, particularly in (but not exclusively to) B2C CRM, the CMO is going to need to be brought into the conversation.
- Maybe “social CRM” is the wrong paradigm? At Tuesday’s keynote, Anthony Lye from Oracle talked about Oracle’s own 50,000 seat CRM implementation. They have implemented a concept he referred to as “implicit CRM” – for example, if there is a service issue, they resolve it once and proactively notify all customers that “look alike”. Carrying this concept into sales he suggested that they integrate internal and external (public, social, etc) data to create “predicative relationships” – that is, information is derived from all available sources to determine likely sales [and presumably service and marketing] outcomes. This concept is not new – Amazon’s got their YMALs (You May Also Like) and many companies have been doing predicative analytics for years – however, this got me to thinking that maybe the conversation about “social CRM” isn’t about “social” at all. Maybe it is about using implicit data/information to drive sales, service and marketing outcomes? Social is simply a channel that creates implicit information – the source of competitive advantage (as always is in) is in analytics, workflow and business processes. Just a thought.
- New entrant into the SMB CRM market place – Jon Ferrara (founder of Goldmine) stopped by the SAP Customer Dinner on Monday night (thank you SAP for your hospitality). I must have missed it when it was announced a few months ago, but he’s founded a new company called Nimble — a new social CRM application for SMBs promising to “transform your community into business opportunity”. I am looking forward to seeing this when it comes out of beta.
I am sure there were other great takeaways from the show, but I leave that commentary to the CRM analysts. Some great quotes/quips from the Show:
“A key attribute of integration cannot be duct tape” – Greg Gianforte
Suites always win, because integration costs effectively go to zero. If you are not careful, you may have 12 clouds to deal with. – Anthony Lye (Oracle)
Trying to build for a homogeneous stack is a dead end – Brad Wilson (Microsoft CRM)
Trust is built between individuals, on behalf of a company – Brian Vellmure (Initium LLC)
Lastly, congratulations to Paul Greenberg for his induction into the CRM Hall of Fame!
Keeping Sales Motivated in Hard Times
Feb 2nd
I participated in a good LinkedIn Q&A last week with 1to1′s Elizabeth Glagowski that resulted in this article on keeping sales people engaged during hard times. Her original question was: How do you keep salespeople motivated in this economy, when clients are increasingly saying no? More >
Five Steps to Best-in-Class Sales Performance
Sep 18th
By Andrew Boyd and Alex Jefferies
CRM Buyer
09/18/08 4:00 AM PT
New technologies are enabling customers to find out more about your company — and your competitors. This presents a new challenge for sales forces, which now have to interact with better-informed buyers. New Aberdeen research indicates 5 factors companies should focus on to improve their sales strategies.
As the advent of new customer-facing technologies (such as social media platforms) changes the way consumers gather information about a particular company’s products or services, sales representatives are challenged to sell to a customer base that better understands the competitive landscape. As a result, companies realize that they must enable their sales force to work smarter, not harder, to acquire and retain customers.
In August 2008, Aberdeen surveyed 218 companies to understand how top-performing companies are positively affecting top-line revenue growth through improved sales performance World Class Managed Hosting from PEER 1, Just $299. Click here. strategies, capabilities and technological enablers. The report, publishing on Oct. 1, examines how top performers (the Best-in-Class companies) put their sales representatives in a position to succeed through a focus on overall sales structure, lead management and cross-functional integration.
You Call That a Lead?
To properly assess the best practices resulting in improved sales effectiveness, the issue of sales and marketing Learn how you can enhance your email marketing program today. Free Trial – Click Here. alignment must first be addressed. According to the March 2007 Aberdeen Benchmark Report, “Automating Leads to Sales,” 56 percent of Best-in-Class companies and 62 percent of Laggards indicated that sales and marketing alignment was a target for improvement. Furthermore, sales and marketing alignment is also a significant influence on technology implementation.
According to the July 2007 Aberdeen Benchmark Report, “Success Strategies in Marketing Automation,” nearly two-thirds of respondents (63 percent) ranked sales and marketing alignment as a top-two challenge to deploying marketing automation Latest News about marketing automation solutions.
While the ongoing struggle between sales and marketing departments concerning the quality and quantity of leads is not a battle that will easily be decided, prior Aberdeen research reveals that 80 percent of the Best-in-Class realize the importance of integrating lead qualification and measurement efforts between the two departments for the overall growth of the business.
Build the House on a Strong Foundation
For this upcoming report, Aberdeen used four key performance criteria to distinguish Best-in-Class sales organizations: 1) year-over-year performance in quota achievement, 2) year-over-year performance in sales cycle time, 3) year-over-year performance in bid-to-win ratio and 4) year-over-year performance in the percentage of time sales representatives spend on administrative tasks.
As the challenges associated with lengthening sales cycles and low sales productivity HP LaserJet M3035 MFP series – Starting at $1,599. Save up to $500. Click Here. continue to mount, the savvy sales manager Improve customer service and productivity with Avaya Unified Communications. continues in the search for the perfect mix of organizational processes and sales automation solutions. Survey results show that the firms enjoying Best-in-Class performance shared several common foundational characteristics, including:
* Formal and documented sales processes (85 percent)
* Defined performance metrics to measure sales effectiveness (76 percent)
* Executive-level support for sales productivity tools (63 percent)
* Formalized sales training program (53 percent)
With these foundational elements in place, the organization can begin to focus on building a sustainable competitive advantage through differentiated process, organizational, measurement and technological capabilities.
Building a Best-in-Class Sales Organization
Based on the findings in this upcoming report, Aberdeen suggests that companies must focus on the following to achieve Best-in-Class performance:
- Define performance metrics to measure sales effectiveness. As the old saying goes, “you can’t manage what you don’t measure.” Currently, only 45 percent of the Industry Average companies have defined performance metrics in place designed to measure the effectiveness of the sales department, compared to 76 percent of the Best-in-Class. In order to garner the support of senior management and receive the proper resources, companies must demonstrate the benefits, or lack thereof, that defined sales processes and technology implementation have on the company’s bottom line. Nearly a quarter (24 percent) of the Industry Average companies that do measure sales performance do so on a monthly basis only. Only 16 percent of the Industry Average measure sales performance in real-time or on a daily basis, compared to 30 percent of the Best-in-Class that track sales performance over the same time period. The pathway to sales productivity can only be successfully navigated once businesses understand where the roadblocks lie.
- Focus on team-based collaborative selling. It is essential for companies to address the structure of their sales departments before making any investment in technology. By organizing the sales hierarchy and creating teams, companies are able to positively affect sales performance through collaborative selling. Currently, 43 percent of the Industry Average, compared to 56 percent of the Best-in-Class, utilize team-based collaborative selling strategies. If it is true that “no man is an island,” then organizations must consider providing various degrees of support, such as subject matter inquiries or visibility into other reps’ prospects and contacts, in the form of a team-based collaborative environment. The additional 28 percent of Industry Average companies that plan to implement such an organizational capability must do so before the focus shifts heavily to technology implementation.
- Focus on lead management. As a way of ensuring that high quality leads enter the pipeline, Best-in-Class companies have instilled an organizational focus on lead management and lead management solutions. Currently, 42 percent of Best-in-Class companies, compared to 26 percent of Laggards, integrate a lead management solution with an existing CRM. Fifty-nine percent of Best-in-Class companies indicated that they decreased the amount of time between pipeline stages, compared to 9 percent of the Industry Average and 4 percent of Laggards. By reducing the amount of time it takes for a lead to receive the necessary sales attention, Best-in-Class companies are better able than their counterparts to quickly target and contact prospects.
- Focus on data quality. Before a company can start to integrate data from various customer-facing channels into a sales solution (such as CRM), care must be taken to ensure the quality of the data. Customer data should be “scrubbed” to identify incomplete contact information or multiple entries for the same contact, for example. Currently, just over a quarter of Best-in-Class companies (27 percent) leverage data quality solutions. An additional 40 percent of Best-in-Class companies plan to leverage such solutions in the future. An early focus on customer data quality translates into more usable information when an enterprise is ready to integrate disparate data silos.
- Integrate data from disparate silos. Once an organization takes the necessary steps to ensure the quality of its customer data, the next step should be to integrate the data from various data silos into a centralized repository that is accessible by all departments within the organization. Forty-two percent of Best-in-Class companies currently utilize data integration solutions, compared to 28 percent of Laggards. Despite the fact that nearly half of Best-in-Class companies currently use data integration solutions, 59 percent of Best-in-Class companies surveyed indicated that they plan to increase the focus on data integration in the next 12 to 24 months. Best-in-Class companies looking to provide sales representatives with a unified view of customers and prospects must take the steps to ensure the representatives have access to information that exists throughout the enterprise.
In order for a company to truly impact sales effectiveness, there must be an organizational focus on sales structure and compensation management, lead management, and the use of sales automation solutions. By achieving harmony between these three things, Best-in-Class companies are able to improve key sales metrics. For example, nearly two-thirds (65 percent) of Best-in-Class companies experience year-over-year improvement in sales contribution margin, compared to 11 percent of Laggards. As a new age of customers becomes increasingly adept at accessing company information and better understanding the competitive landscape, businesses are forced to equip their sales forces with the tools that enable them to work smarter, not harder. By integrating customer data from disparate data silos, as well as providing the necessary organizational support, Best-in-Class companies are nearing that elusive 360-degree view of the customer.
Developing a Smarter Sales Organization
Nov 19th
Another article that I published last month… enjoy.
Sales teams are missing revenue targets, not hitting quota and facing stalled opportunities as organizations strive to remain competitive and service increasingly discerning customers. In response, sales managers are still focused on lead quality, but they’ve also shifted their focus to increasing sales win rates and improving sales representatives’ knowledge of products, customer needs and competition.
Read the full article here.
New Research on Sales Effectiveness
Jun 21st
I am working on a new study on sales effectiveness:
The research will examine the methods, processes and technologies that sales management can use to improve sales productivity from the point of view of the salesperson. Recommendations from the study will help managers improve close rates, reduce sales cycle times and increase the proposal bid-to-win ratio.
Read the research preview here.