Empirical Rationalism and Other Oxymora
Posts tagged CRM
CRM Evolution 2010 – Quick Thoughts and Takeaways (#CRMe10)
Aug 4th
I attended CRM Evolution in NYC this week. It was great to catch up with some old friends and many of the vendors I used to brief with as an analyst. It was also good to meet actual customers with actual business problems at the show (a departure from some of the other trade events I’ve been to lately). One significant change since the last time I attended a CRM-specific conference was the level of sophistication of the end users – the category has clearly matured. We are no longer talking about “what” needs to be done, or “why”, or even “how” implement and measure value — the conversations I had with end-users generally centered around really hard customer management problems (i.e. identifying and integrating “socialgraphic” and cross-site information into CRM, building out multi-purpose, multi-channel, shared service interaction centers, etc).
A few quick thoughts and key takeaways from the show:
- Everybody (yes, I do mean everybody I spoke to) is talking about “social CRM” – however, when probed there wasn’t a lot of evidence that social CRM has evolved much beyond twitter monitoring and Facebook connections in the CRM application. If customers are really going to embrace social CRM as a competitive differentiator, vendors need to take a leadership stance on demonstrating business value that can be measured with anything other than a “wow” meter. Greg Gianforte (CEO of RightNow) illustrated an interesting example of social CRM in action (paraphrasing):
If a customer has a problem with their digital camera, they are not going to wait until the next day when the call center is open – they’ll send out a tweet. [Companies need to be able to] take that tweet, open a ticket, solve the issue and send a tweet back.
- This is one use case out of thousands of possibilities. As an industry, we are still in the early stages of the social CRM platforms that are being built today will be implemented down the road. I applaud the work that is being done by the vendors and the thought leaders, but it seems to me that capabilities and thought leadership is still very much ahead of market demand.
- Where the hell is marketing? With all the talk of social CRM, it was interesting to note marketing’s conspicuous absent (both by function and role) from the CRM scene (If you look at the marketing functionality of many CRM apps, it would be easy to counter that this has always been the case). The attendees I spoke to were mostly IT and business analyst types – with some sales and contact center LOB people thrown in for good measure. There are significant challenges in integrating social into the CRM systems. One fast-fashion CxO I spoke to last month told me that the average age in his loyalty database is 25 years older than his target demographic (teenage girls 15-19) –simply put, he’s got a very active community of social influencers on Facebook, but Mom has a death grip on the loyalty card. If social CRM is going to fly, particularly in (but not exclusively to) B2C CRM, the CMO is going to need to be brought into the conversation.
- Maybe “social CRM” is the wrong paradigm? At Tuesday’s keynote, Anthony Lye from Oracle talked about Oracle’s own 50,000 seat CRM implementation. They have implemented a concept he referred to as “implicit CRM” – for example, if there is a service issue, they resolve it once and proactively notify all customers that “look alike”. Carrying this concept into sales he suggested that they integrate internal and external (public, social, etc) data to create “predicative relationships” – that is, information is derived from all available sources to determine likely sales [and presumably service and marketing] outcomes. This concept is not new – Amazon’s got their YMALs (You May Also Like) and many companies have been doing predicative analytics for years – however, this got me to thinking that maybe the conversation about “social CRM” isn’t about “social” at all. Maybe it is about using implicit data/information to drive sales, service and marketing outcomes? Social is simply a channel that creates implicit information – the source of competitive advantage (as always is in) is in analytics, workflow and business processes. Just a thought.
- New entrant into the SMB CRM market place – Jon Ferrara (founder of Goldmine) stopped by the SAP Customer Dinner on Monday night (thank you SAP for your hospitality). I must have missed it when it was announced a few months ago, but he’s founded a new company called Nimble — a new social CRM application for SMBs promising to “transform your community into business opportunity”. I am looking forward to seeing this when it comes out of beta.
I am sure there were other great takeaways from the show, but I leave that commentary to the CRM analysts. Some great quotes/quips from the Show:
“A key attribute of integration cannot be duct tape” – Greg Gianforte
Suites always win, because integration costs effectively go to zero. If you are not careful, you may have 12 clouds to deal with. – Anthony Lye (Oracle)
Trying to build for a homogeneous stack is a dead end – Brad Wilson (Microsoft CRM)
Trust is built between individuals, on behalf of a company – Brian Vellmure (Initium LLC)
Lastly, congratulations to Paul Greenberg for his induction into the CRM Hall of Fame!
The Difference Between Contact Management and CRM
Jan 29th
From CRM Buyer (With Alex Jefferies)
01/29/09 4:00 AM PT
Organizations considering contact management or customer relationship management solutions must evaluate the sales model of their organization and implement the solution that aligns best with their business needs. It all depends on who talks to whom, write Aberdeen’s Andrew Boyd and Alex Jefferies.
The budget cuts and spending freezes resulting from the current economic downturn have reduced the number of legitimate opportunities for sales representatives; therefore, organizations are placing a renewed emphasis on cutting costs and customer retention to combat certain economic realities.
In an ongoing attempt to meet the expectations of prospects and improve the lifetime value of current customers, businesses are examining ways of unifying fragmented customer data and making this customer and account information available to the organization at large. Contact management (CM) solutions and customer relationship management (CRM) solutions are two primary technology enablers allowing organizations to gain better control of their information assets and processes.
CM solutions are productivity and sales automation tools designed to allow individuals or teams to manage contacts, opportunities, or account information more efficiently. CRM solutions, on the other hand, are process-centric, multi-module solutions that serve as a system of record for all customer interactions. Varying definitions and the lack of a standard definition between CM and CRM solutions have some organizations pondering which is a better fit for their business and why.
What You Need to Know
Over the past year, Aberdeen has surveyed thousands of end-users to better understand how sales interaction models influence technology purchasing decisions. The research reveals the choice between a CM and a CRM solution often boils down to the sales interaction model of the organization, as well as the business challenges the company faces.
For instance, an organization with a one-to-many interaction model, in which one sales representative targets multiple job roles within a company, may consider a CM solution in order to better organize account information and conversation details. On the other hand, a company with many sales representatives or marketing professionals targeting a single job role would prefer a CRM solution to log call activity and leave detailed relationship notes for one another.
Sales Models Influence Technology Adoption
Aberdeen has identified four common sales interaction models that require certain functionality from technology solutions.
- One-to-One Model: In a one-to-one model, there is typically a single representative that is tasked with selling into a single job role. Insurance agents and stock brokers, for example, typically practice one-to-one selling.
Take, for example, the following scenario: Bob, a sales manager at a small marketing services firm, believes that Jane, the founder of her own business, could benefit from his offerings. Understanding that Jane is the owner of the company and therefore the head of a small employee staff, Bob targets Jane as the job role with decision-making authority. A CM solution becomes Bob’s preferred solution because it allows him to keep accurate contact and company information on Jane’s business, as well as detailed notes surrounding their conversations.
- One-to-Many Model: In a one-to-many model, one individual targets multiple job roles within a company.
For example, say that a number of years have passed in our scenario, and Jane’s business has grown into a large national brand. No longer is Jane the one and only contact with purchasing power at the company; she now has a staff of decision-makers with buying power. Bob, firmly believing that his services can continue to help Jane’s business increase its exposure, targets the new CMO, COO, and EVP as he articulates his value proposition.
With so many conversations taking place with different people within Jane’s company, Bob relies on his CM solution to keep accurate records of job roles, phone numbers, e-mails, and notes. An added bonus of Bob’s CM solution is that it allows him to discern the relationship between contacts based on his notes or, in the case of more advanced CM solution, through contact grouping or networking.
- Many-to-One Model: In a many-to-one model, there are multiple individuals, such as sales, marketing and service professionals, interacting with a single job role at a company.
For example, the growth of Bob’s business has resulted in the development of new products and services. In this example, Jane has placed a call into a service representative with a related question to a previous project. The service representative sees alignment between Jane’s question and the latest product release; therefore, Jane is invited to a webinar that showcases the new product.
By using a multi-module CRM solution, Bob’s service professional can log the activity around Jane’s account and leave detailed notes so other employees, such as marketing professionals or accountants, know how and when to follow-up with Jane.
- Many-to-Many Model: In a many-to-many model, there are multiple individuals interacting with multiple job roles at a company.
For example, marketing individuals or service individuals at an organization target their counterparts at other companies to sell into. Bob, whose work with Jane’s boutique has catapulted his business into the spotlight, has filled out his own marketing staff and professional services offerings. These individuals on the marketing side target similar job roles at Jane’s company. This coordinated effort requires a heightened sense of internal visibility; therefore, Bob has replaced his CM solution with an integrated CRM tool. Bob is now able to access customer service information, accounting and billing details, and marketing data through his CRM system.
Recommended Actions
Organizations considering CM or CRM solutions must evaluate the sales model of their organization and implement the solution that aligns best with their business needs. If a company is primarily focused on taming information overload at the lowest cost and providing the greatest selling autonomy for their sales team, then a CM solution may be an ideal fit. On the other hand, if a company’s only hope at providing a 360-degree view of the customer to all parties within the organization is to integrate the data that exists in disparate silos, such as a contact center, marketing databases, or accounting profile, a CRM solution may fit their business needs. As is the case with any technology implementation, the organizational processes and performance metrics in place often provide a foundation for success.
Read the rest of the recommendations.